Talk:Supporter Packs

Two things I'd appreciate input on
1. Anyone object to me making disclaimers for certain packs (Elder + Friend, Party Pack), noting that each pack typically contains the contents of less expensive packs in the same series, and then altering the various lists accordingly? The current approach of providing exhaustive lists for every pack in each series hurts readability imo. If people prefer the status quo, could we talk about making the article easier to skim through by highlighting the bullet points which pertain to content not found in lower tiers?

2. Anyone in favour of reversing the order of series? I'd assume that most of the time there'd be more interest in the current series than previous ones - and in the future when the majority of the article is taken up by packs no longer available, I'm not sure people interested in old packs would really care which order they're listed in.

— sarno | TALK | 09:23, 30 August 2018 (UTC)


 * If you think it'd look better I say go for it. (It can always be reverted). I agree that the list is rather lengthy. I was thinking of possibly using tabber to make the vertical space smaller, but switching it wouldn't hurt. As for the order, I agree they should be inverted. --GeoGalvanic (talk | testspace) 20:32, 1 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Ended up going a different way to 1 - thinking about it again, I did feel a desire to be as thorough as each possible.
 * Otherwise it's forcing people to go back and look at previous lists, which to some extent felt wrong. — sarno | TALK | 02:06, 7 September 2018 (UTC)