User talk:GeoGalvanic

Do you ever talk to yourself?
I too, sometimes talk to myself. Sometimes I talk to other people though. Feel free to talk to me here ;) --GeoGalvanic (talk | testspace) 08:53, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
 * ohai.
 * What do you call a very rough draft of something the author plans to flesh out later? A qwiki! — sarno | TALK | 14:42, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Lol, I like it :P --GeoGalvanic (talk | testspace) 16:18, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Skill Specialisation tree nodes & their icons
Hey,

Sorry; I hadn't seen what you did on Mana Strike and possibly other pages.

Would you prefer that, or just the art as seen on Glacier? — sarno | TALK | 20:25, 29 May 2018 (UTC)


 * The art looks better in my opinion. I think it's best to go with that for now. It just might be harder to upkeep in the long run because people won't be able to find the images themselves as easily. (Only did them for mana strike)--GeoGalvanic (talk | testspace) 21:32, 29 May 2018 (UTC)


 * I share both your preference and your concern.
 * While it's a bit of a crap 'solution', I can always be asked where to find something. It's trivial for me to check. — sarno | TALK | 22:24, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Is this obnoxious...

 * Would you prefer the polite answer or the honest answer? :P
 * It might work if confined to your signature. — sarno | TALK | 14:30, 15 June 2018 (UTC)



No Tag
Heya,

Not personally a fan of the way this looks.

I was thinking - how about we just use the tag, then document its absence on the main article page? — sarno | TALK | 17:57, 2 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Depends... If they have the same name I can't list them separately like I do on Spell Skills. One of the reasons why Trasochi said they weren't tagged is so as not to generate confusion on their damage being amplified by spell skills. I might try to find a way to change up the template a bit so that it's not seen as prominently, but I would like to keep the distinction. I haven't been able to think of a better placeholder name for them. --GeoGalvanic (talk | testspace) 19:54, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Congrats on the successful RfA!
— sarno | TALK | 13:21, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Crafting
Great explanation! Really clear and easy to follow. :) — sarno | TALK | 06:11, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

About merge the navbox
The goal of the redirection from Template:Classes, Template:ItemsNav, and Template:Skills to Template:WikiNav is to have everything accessible from one NavBox.you think that it would not be a good thing ? why remove it ? --GKPlight (talk) 20:43, 7 April 2021 (UTC)


 * @GKPlight, please see the discussion I started hereGeoGalvanic (talk) 20:54, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

UCX implementation
Hi! I'm Tots, one of the Community Managers here at Fandom. I'm here to talk with you about the upcoming changes we'll need to make on the wikis when the new UCX is released. We'll need to adapt your current content - mainly the design and implemented code - to ensure they're compatible and operational.

Specifically, the UCS will mainly affect the Frontpage, the design (logo, background, favicon, themes), the CSS/JS used, and some templates that will need to adapt their look to fit. It's still several weeks until the wiki will be migrated but I'm here to work alongside you to anticipate all the work regarding review, improvements, and adaptations to the new skin.

If it's alright with you I'll start reviewing the elements I mentioned and describing to you what work should be done. For the design, I can work with the future version and get it set up ahead of time so that once the wiki is migrated it's ready. Regarding the Frontpage, templates, and code, I can work and implement the changes now to have them properly working both in the present and future, but getting all the changes done in advance.

Let me know what you think about all of this and we can start working together on the upcoming changes.

Thanks!

HeyTots https://vignette2.wikia.nocookie.net/joeplayground/images/e/e5/FandomStaff.png (Contact) 18:57, 11 May 2021 (UTC)